Please copy and paste the questions into your reply and leave a space between the questions and your replies. Please send a professional headshot, medium large and perfectly focused, for me to upload with the article I will write. I'm sorry, I don't offer links for free yet I do highlight your expertise. Please, no AI content.
1. We often hear or read about what it takes to win together in an organization in any industry and profession yet we don't often hear or read about learning to lose together. What does this mean, philosophically maybe, to a team, in regards to unselfishness and harmony so it can operate at its best and move forward, successfully?
2. How does a team best learn to lose together so it can then win together? No long lists. Please respond in paragraph form.
posted8/27/2025
deadline8/29/2025
processing
published
Recently published by communicationintelligence.substack.com
Employment Prospects of People Suspended or Fired: Charlie Kirk's murder
Are we, as a collective, forgetting what we learned as children, that certain communication can get us in hot water? This article will talk about the possible employment future of people who spoke out in a way that was considered offensive in regards to a murder (one many of us have seen up close on video) of a public speaker.
1. What does it say to workers and society when employers are either terminating or suspending employees who publicly communicated their approval and maybe, glee at a person being shot through the neck and murdered while speaking publicly?
2. Do employees crude public comments about the murder make employers uneasy, beyond the public relations danger, about the trustworthiness of their employees' character and possible capacity for violence themselves?
3. What will likely become of employees' future employment prospects who publicly communicated any type of emotion of approval for the Kirk killing?