Are we, as a collective, forgetting what we learned as children, that certain communication can get us in hot water? This article will talk about the possible employment future of people who spoke out in a way that was considered offensive in regards to a murder (one many of us have seen up close on video) of a public speaker.
1. What does it say to workers and society when employers are either terminating or suspending employees who publicly communicated their approval and maybe, glee at a person being shot through the neck and murdered while speaking publicly?
2. Do employees crude public comments about the murder make employers uneasy, beyond the public relations danger, about the trustworthiness of their employees' character and possible capacity for violence themselves?
3. What will likely become of employees' future employment prospects who publicly communicated any type of emotion of approval for the Kirk killing?