With the Trump administration striking a deal to acquire a 10% stake in Intel, Washington is signaling a more direct role in one of America’s most strategically important industries. The move blurs the traditional lines between public and private enterprise, raising questions about valuation, governance, and national competitiveness in a world where semiconductors drive everything from AI to defense systems. At the same time, it forces investors to reckon with whether this is a one-off intervention or the start of a broader playbook for U.S. industrial policy. With those thoughts in mind, we need thes queries answered for the story. 1. Does the government taking a direct ownership stake in Intel set a precedent for more U.S. intervention in private companies, and how might markets interpret this shift toward “industrial policy” investing? 2. How could a federal stake in Intel affect shareholder value, governance, and Intel’s ability to make decisions independently in a highly competitive sector? 3. Is this move primarily about countering China’s semiconductor dominance, and does direct U.S. ownership strengthen or weaken Intel’s global competitiveness? 4. Does tying taxpayer money to a single corporate player create more economic risk than broader subsidies or incentives across the semiconductor industry? 5. Could this lead to government stakes in other strategic companies (e.g., in AI, defense tech, or green energy, for example), and what would that mean for how investors approach U.S. equities overall? Thank you.

Seek H-1B and staff outsource experts for a story on talent outsourcing.

Published on: 9/25/2025

With the Trump admin's new $100,000 H-1B now in play, we're looking at the potential impact on the global employment/talent outsourcing, especially in the US. We suspect outsourcing into the US is about to accelerate and want to get in front of th issue for out business audience. we need these queries answered for the story, the sooner the better. 1. What do you make of the new US H-1B $100,000 buy in? What's the impact on US hiring and why? 2. What does the new H-1B rule mean for the outsourcing industry, especially for outsourcing talent into the US in a post $2,000-per-staffer H-1B world? Are we going to see an outsourcing boom now? If so, why? If not, why not? 3. Any tips for US companies looking to work with outsourcing companies? What are the best questions to ask and ground to cover, and why?

Published on: 9/26/2025

Seeking H-1B, staffing, and outsourcing experts: "3 Ways the new H-1B ruIe will turbocharge staff outsourcing"

Published on: 9/25/2025

HB1 holders - can be anonymous

Published on: 9/27/2025

I’m writing a piece on the Trump administration’s proposed changes to the H-1B visa program, including the newly announced $100,000 fee. I’m looking to speak with current H-1B visa holders about what this program means to them. You can remain anonymous if you prefer! Please be based in the U.S. I’m especially interested in hearing: -What do you think of the proposed changes? -How has the news about the $100,000 fee impacted your sense of stability or plans? -Are you reconsidering any travel, work, or family decisions because of the confusion? -What do you want people to understand about H-1B holders?

Published on: 9/27/2025

20 Pitching Tips to Win Media Coverage in 2025

Real Pitches That Landed Coverage on WSJ, Forbes & More…

Top 12 AI Tools For Better Media Pitching

How to Pitch a Journo Request? (A Complete Beginner's Guide)